Class-action lawsuits serve as a powerful legal tool for addressing widespread harm caused by corporations, defective products, or institutional negligence. Montana's legal landscape features specialized law firms with proven experience handling these complex multi-plaintiff cases across state and federal courts.

Claims administrators and law firms seeking partnerships or referrals need to identify Montana-based class-action attorneys with demonstrated capabilities in case management, settlement negotiations, and courtroom advocacy. When settlements are reached, efficient settlement distribution becomes critical—platforms like Talli streamline fund distribution, prevent fraud, and enhance claimant experience with secure payment methods and real-time tracking. The following analysis examines leading Montana class-action law firms, their specializations, and the factors that distinguish top-tier practices in this demanding legal field.

Key Takeaways

• Montana's specialized class-action law firms handle complex multi-plaintiff litigation across consumer protection, employment, property rights, and environmental cases
• Leading firms like Heenan & Cook have recovered over $250 million for Montana consumers through class action settlements
• Modern digital disbursement platforms significantly improve settlement redemption rates compared to traditional paper check distribution
• Montana's rural geography creates unique challenges for class action administration, making statewide office presence and digital communication capabilities essential
• Selecting qualified class-action counsel requires evaluating experience markers, case outcome metrics, and established settlement distribution systems

1) Heenan & Cook, PLLC

Heenan & Cook, PLLC reports over $250 million in settlements overall, and over $80 million recovered for consumers in class actions and consumer protection litigation. The firm operates as one of Montana's leading plaintiff-focused class action practices with four office locations across the state.

The Missoula-based firm maintains offices at 310 S. 5th St. W., #1, Missoula, MT 59801, with additional locations in Billings, Bozeman, and Kalispell. This statewide presence allows them to serve clients across Montana's vast geographic area.

Heenan & Cook has sent tens of thousands of settlement checks to Montanans over their years of practice. This high-volume payout experience demonstrates their capability to manage large-scale class action settlements requiring extensive claimant communication and fund distribution.

The firm specializes in consumer class action litigation, product liability class actions, and consumer protection cases. Their attorneys handle cases involving defective products, deceptive business practices, and corporate misconduct affecting multiple parties.

Key Office Locations:

• Missoula: (406) 888-4444 – 310 S. 5th St. W., #1
• Billings: (406) 839-9091 – 2224 Montana Avenue
• Bozeman: (406) 898-4946 – 1043B Stoneridge Drive
• Kalispell: (406) 884-2522 – 728 S. Main Street

The firm operates Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM across all locations. Their tagline "Real Montana Lawyers. Real Results." reflects their commitment to representing local consumers against corporate defendants.

Claims administrators working with Heenan & Cook can expect established systems for managing mass payout distributions given their extensive track record with large plaintiff classes.

2) Silverman Law Office, PLLC

Silverman Law Office, PLLC is actively leading the 2025-2026 Montana property tax class action lawsuit against the Montana Department of Revenue. The firm maintains multiple offices including locations in Bozeman, Helena, and Butte (3334 Harrison Avenue, Butte, MT 59701).

The firm filed appeals for 183 properties during the 2025 cycle as part of their ongoing class action case. This litigation alleges the Department of Revenue used sales data outside the legally allowed timeframe when assessing property valuations.

Silverman Law Office serves clients statewide, including Billings, Great Falls, Helena, Anaconda, Deer Lodge, Philipsburg, Whitehall, Manhattan, and Three Forks. Their geographic reach makes them accessible to property owners across Montana affected by the tax assessment dispute.

Practice Areas Include:

• Class action litigation (property tax cases)
• Estate planning
• Business litigation
• Real estate litigation
• Trust disputes

The property tax class action seeks to require the Montana Department of Revenue to reassess properties statewide using correct data and issue refunds to affected property owners. This case demonstrates the firm's willingness to pursue novel class action theories against government entities.

For claims administrators handling potential settlement distributions from this case, the geographic scope across Montana creates disbursement challenges that modern payment platforms can address efficiently.

3) Tarlow Stonecipher Weamer & Kelly, PLLC

Tarlow Stonecipher Weamer & Kelly their class-action practice page states the firm has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in class action matters. The Bozeman-based firm handles both plaintiff and defense-side class action litigation.

The firm can be reached at (406) 586-9714 or via email at ClientServices@lawmt.com. They maintain office hours Monday through Friday from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM.

Their Class Action Experience Spans:

• Oil and gas litigation
• Employment class actions
• Consumer protection cases
• Corporate law matters
• Civil litigation

This dual capability—representing both plaintiffs and defendants—provides Tarlow Stonecipher with comprehensive knowledge of class action procedures from multiple perspectives. Their experience informs strategic decisions throughout the litigation process. According to the Federal Judicial Center, understanding both sides of class action litigation strengthens case strategy and settlement negotiations.

The firm's corporate law background allows them to handle complex commercial class actions involving business disputes, securities matters, and contract issues affecting multiple parties. This expertise proves valuable for cases requiring detailed financial analysis and corporate document review.

Claims administrators and law firms seeking co-counsel relationships will find Tarlow Stonecipher's breadth of experience valuable for complex multi-party litigation in Montana state and federal courts.

4) Garlington, Lohn & Robinson (GLR)

Garlington, Lohn & Robinson has achieved both District Court and Montana Supreme Court victories in class action defense matters. The firm maintains offices in Great Falls and Missoula, serving clients throughout Montana.

GLR focuses primarily on class action defense, representing corporate clients against plaintiff classes. Their attorneys have successfully defended class actions involving employee handbook disputes, demonstrating their ability to navigate complex employment litigation.

Notable Class Action Attorneys at GLR:

• Justin K. Cole
• Randall J. Colbert
• Bradley J. Luck
• Robert C. Lukes
• Emma L. Mediak
• Robert J. Phillips
• Brian J. Smith

Randall J. Colbert has received recognition in Best Lawyers in America, reflecting the firm's professional standing within the legal community. This recognition signals the caliber of legal representation available for class action defense matters.

The firm operates Monday through Friday from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM. Their approach emphasizes "scalable legal counsel" that adapts to case complexity and client needs.

Practice Areas Include:

• Class action defense
• Employment law
• Commercial litigation
• Business law
• Environmental law

While GLR primarily handles defense work, their extensive class action experience makes them valuable for corporate clients facing multi-plaintiff litigation in Montana courts. Their Supreme Court victories demonstrate appellate capabilities for cases requiring extended litigation.

5) Holloway & Hulling, PLLC

Holloway & Hulling, PLLC earned the Best Attorney 2025 designation in Missoula, Montana. The firm brings over 25 years of combined experience to their litigation practice.

The firm maintains offices in both Missoula and Bozeman to serve clients across western Montana. Contact information includes (406) 880-7424 for the Missoula office and (406) 898-0550 for Bozeman.

Practice Areas Include:

• Criminal defense
• Personal injury litigation
• Family law
• General civil litigation

The firm employs seven award-winning attorneys who handle complex litigation matters. While their primary focus extends beyond class actions, their litigation experience and regional presence make them a resource for multi-plaintiff cases requiring local counsel.

Holloway & Hulling operates Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Their dual-office structure provides geographic flexibility for clients in Montana's most populated regions.

For law firms seeking local counsel in Montana, Holloway & Hulling offers established relationships within the state's legal community and familiarity with local court procedures.

Key Factors to Consider When Choosing a Class-Action Law Firm

Selecting the right legal representation requires careful evaluation of attorney qualifications, proven track records, and communication practices. These core elements determine whether a firm can effectively manage complex multi-plaintiff litigation and achieve favorable outcomes for all parties involved.

Experience in Complex Litigation

Class-action cases demand specialized legal expertise that extends beyond traditional litigation skills. Attorneys must demonstrate proficiency in federal procedural rules, class certification requirements, and multi-district litigation management.

Critical Experience Markers:

• Years handling class-action cases specifically
• Familiarity with relevant industry regulations
• Track record with similar case types
• Knowledge of federal court procedures

Montana's unique geographic challenges require firms with statewide capabilities. Firms like Heenan & Cook with multiple office locations can better serve plaintiffs distributed across Montana's vast territory.

Law firms should provide detailed case histories demonstrating their ability to navigate complex discovery processes. They must show competence in managing large-scale document review, expert witness coordination, and multi-jurisdictional legal challenges.

Resource Requirements Include:

• Adequate staffing for extensive case management
• Financial capacity for lengthy litigation
• Technology systems for document management
• Established relationships with expert witnesses

Success Rate and Case Outcomes

Past performance indicators provide the most reliable measure of a firm's capabilities in class-action representation. Claims administrators and referring attorneys should examine both settlement amounts and dismissal rates when evaluating potential counsel.

Key Performance Metrics:

• Settlement Values: Average and total recovery amounts
• Case Resolution Time: Duration from filing to conclusion
• Class Certification Rate: Percentage of cases achieving class status
• Fee Structures: Transparency in contingency arrangements

Successful firms maintain detailed records of their case outcomes across different industries and claim types. They should readily provide specific examples of similar cases with documented results and client satisfaction levels.

Montana firms with proven track records—such as Heenan & Cook's over $250 million in recoveries—demonstrate their ability to handle complex legal challenges effectively.

Client Communication and Support

Effective communication systems ensure all stakeholders receive timely updates throughout lengthy class-action proceedings. Law firms must establish clear protocols for regular case status reports and milestone notifications.

Communication Standards Include:

• Regular progress reports to claims administrators
• Accessible client portals for case updates
• Designated points of contact for inquiries
• Clear explanation of legal procedures and timelines

Professional firms maintain dedicated support staff to handle administrative tasks and client communications. This allows lead attorneys to focus on case strategy while ensuring all parties remain informed of developments.

Technology Integration:

• Secure document sharing platforms
• Automated notification systems
• Online case status tracking
• Video conferencing capabilities for remote meetings

Montana's rural population makes digital communication capabilities essential for class action firms. Virtual consultations have become widely available for clients located hours from the nearest office location.

Response times for inquiries should not exceed 48 hours during active litigation periods. Professional communication standards reflect the firm's overall commitment to client service and case management excellence.

Settlement Distribution: The Final Phase of Class Actions

Once a class action settles, the distribution phase presents unique challenges—particularly in Montana where claimants may be spread across a state larger than many countries. Traditional paper check distribution creates delays, increases costs, and results in lower redemption rates.

Why Digital Disbursements Matter

Modern settlement administration requires technology solutions that address Montana's geographic realities. Firms that have sent "tens of thousands of settlement checks" face ongoing challenges with:

• Check mailing delays to rural addresses
• Uncashed checks and escheatment issues
• Administrative burden of reissuing lost payments
• Compliance tracking across large plaintiff classes

Talli's AI-driven payment platform addresses these challenges by offering claimants flexible payout options including digital wallets, prepaid cards, and direct deposits—no bank account required. The platform bakes in KYC, OFAC, and W-9 collection to maintain legal compliance throughout the disbursement lifecycle.

Boosting Redemption Rates

Settlement redemption rates directly impact case outcomes and client satisfaction. When claimants face barriers to receiving their funds—whether through lost checks, inconvenient payment methods, or confusing processes—redemption rates suffer.

Digital-first disbursement platforms increase redemption through:

• Smart reminders via email and SMS
• Mobile-friendly payment selection
• Real-time tracking for claimants and administrators
• Multiple payment method options

For Montana class actions involving thousands of claimants across remote areas, these capabilities translate to higher completion rates and reduced administrative costs.

Class-Action Lawsuits in Montana

Montana courts handle various types of class-action lawsuits that affect multiple plaintiffs with similar damages. Understanding the state's class action landscape helps potential claimants and legal professionals evaluate their options.

Common Types of Class-Action Cases

Consumer Protection Cases represent a significant category in Montana. These lawsuits target defective products, false advertising, and unfair business practices affecting multiple consumers.

Property Rights Litigation has emerged as a major category. The current Montana property tax class action filed by Silverman Law Office affects property valuations across the state and seeks refunds for affected property owners.

Employment-Related Class Actions involve wage and hour violations, discrimination claims, or benefit disputes affecting multiple employees. Montana's employment laws create specific requirements that distinguish these cases from other jurisdictions.

Environmental Litigation reflects Montana's natural resource economy. Cases involving mining operations, chemical contamination, and environmental damage generate ongoing class-action matters related to health impacts and property damage.

Data Breach and Privacy violations have become increasingly common nationwide, including cases affecting Montana residents.

Role of State and Federal Courts

Montana state courts handle class actions involving state law claims and cases where damages fall below federal thresholds. The Montana Courts system applies Montana's specific procedural rules for class certification and case management.

Federal courts take jurisdiction when cases involve federal law violations or meet diversity requirements. Cases with defendants from different states and damages exceeding $5 million typically move to federal court.

The court system determines whether a case qualifies for class-action status through specific criteria:

• Numerosity requires too many plaintiffs to join individually
• Commonality demands shared legal or factual issues among class members
• Typicality ensures representative plaintiffs have claims similar to other class members
• Adequacy requires competent counsel and representatives who will protect class interests effectively

Montana's Unique Considerations

Montana's small population and vast geographic area create distinctive challenges for class action litigation:

• Rural Plaintiff Distribution: Class members may live hours from the nearest law firm office
• Limited Local Counsel: Fewer attorneys specialize in class action work compared to larger states
• Statewide Service: Most firms accept cases regardless of client location within Montana
• Virtual Accessibility: Remote consultations have become standard practice

These factors make efficient settlement administration particularly important for Montana class actions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a class-action lawsuit and how does it differ from a regular lawsuit in Montana?

A class-action lawsuit allows multiple individuals with similar claims to sue a defendant collectively rather than filing separate cases. In Montana, courts require that cases meet certification standards including numerosity (too many plaintiffs for individual suits), commonality (shared legal issues), typicality (representative claims), and adequacy of representation. Regular lawsuits involve individual plaintiffs pursuing their specific damages, while class actions address harm affecting many people through consolidated proceedings.

How are class-action attorneys in Montana typically paid?

Montana class-action firms primarily operate on contingency fees, meaning attorneys receive payment only if the case results in a settlement or verdict. Contingency fees typically range from 25% to 40% of the recovery, depending on case complexity and duration. Courts must approve fee arrangements in class action settlements to ensure fairness to class members. Settlement proceeds generally cover litigation expenses such as expert witness fees and document production costs.

What steps are involved in receiving a payout from a class-action settlement?

Settlement distribution begins after court approval of the settlement agreement. Claimants typically receive notice via mail or publication explaining how to file claims. The claims process involves submitting required documentation within specified deadlines, followed by claims review and validation. Once approved, distribution timelines vary based on claim volume and payment method selection. Modern platforms like Talli streamline this process through digital payment options and real-time tracking.

Can I choose my payment method for a class-action settlement in Montana?

Payment options depend on the settlement terms and claims administrator. Traditional settlements often default to paper checks mailed to claimants. Modern settlement administration platforms offer flexible options including direct deposit, digital wallets, and prepaid cards. Talli provides claimants with payment method choices that work for their situation—including options for claimants without bank accounts—which can increase overall redemption rates.

How do I find out if I'm eligible for a class-action settlement in Montana?

Class members typically receive direct notice of settlements via mail, email, or publication in newspapers. Settlement administrators maintain websites where potential claimants can verify eligibility and submit claims. Montana law firms handling class actions also provide information about active cases and eligibility requirements. If you believe you may be affected by ongoing litigation—such as the current property tax class action—contact the lead counsel directly to discuss your situation.